PT Classroom - A Review of Sacroiliac Joint Provocative Tests ׀ by Chai Rasavong, MPT, COMT, CMTPT, MBA

 

The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is a synovial joint that garners a lot of controversy as it can share common pain patterns with multiple conditions at the spine (stenosis, DDD, herniated disc, etc.), hip (FAI, OA, AVN, etc) and pelvis (glut tear, piriformis, pelvic floor) (1). Given the shared pain patterns involving the SIJ and the structures mentioned previously, obtaining a SIJ pain diagnosis can prove to be challenging. Diagnosing SIJ pain involves obtaining a detailed subjective history which is positive, conducting a thorough lumbar spine & hip exam to help rule out issues at these structures, obtaining positive provocative test results for the SIJ and achieving a positive response to an intra-articular injection (1). Often times SIJ ROM and position testing are performed in the physical exam as well but have been found to be unreliable (1, 2, 3). The chart provided below details common pain referral patterns for the lumbar spine, hip and SIJ (1, 4, 5).

Spinal Stenosis (1, 4) Isolated Hip Pathology (1, 4)  Sacroiliac Joint (1, 5)
Buttock CommonButtock Pain (71%) Buttock, PSIS (94%)
Groin Uncommon (except L1, L2) Thigh and Groin (55%) Groin Not Uncommon (14%)
Lower Extremity Common Knee or Below (47%) Lower Extremity Common (28%)
Lateral Hip - Common Lateral Hip - Common Lateral Hip and Thigh Common
Lumbar Region Common Lumbar Pain Uncommon LLower Lumbar Region (72%)

In this article we will review the SIJ provocative tests involved with diagnosing SIJ pain. Laslett et al (1, 2) describes five SIJ provocative tests: 1) Distraction 2) Thigh Thrust 3) Compression 4) FABER 5) Gaenslen’s Maneuver. When these 5 provocative tests are performed in combination they are proven to have a high degree of sensitivity and specificity (1. 2). The thigh thrust and compression test were found to be the most sensitive and the distraction test the most specific with the highest positive predictive value (1, 2). When interpreting the results for the SIJ provocative tests (1, 2):
0 Positive Tests = Ruled Out
1 Positive Test = Suspicion
2 Positive Tests = Fair Confidence
3-5 Positive Tests = High Confidence

In addition, if centralization of pain is not achieved during a McKenzie evaluation of repeated movements/sustained positions specificity increases for a SIJ pain diagnosis (1, 2).

Distraction (1, 2)

With the patient in supine a vertically oriented pressure is applied to the anterior superior iliac spinous (ASIS) processes directed posteriorly, distracting the SIJ.

 

 

 

Thigh Thrust (1, 2)

With the patient in supine, holding the hip flexed to 90 degrees and stabilizing the opposite ASIS with the other hand, a vertically oriented force is applied through the line of the femur directed posteriorly, producing a posterior shearing force at the SIJ.

 

Compression (1, 2)

With the patient in sidelying a vertically directed force is applied to the iliac crest directed towards the floor compressing the SIJs.



 

 

FABER (Flexion, Abduction/External Rotation) (1, 2)

With the patient in supine cross the same side foot over the opposite side thigh while stabilizing the opposite ASIS and apply a force on the same side knee of the patient exaggerating the motion of hip flexion, abduction and external rotation resulting in a tensile force on the anterior aspect of the SIJs.


Gaenslen (1, 2)

Wfont>ith the patient in supine near the edge of the table, the patient is asked to flex the opposite hip grasping their knee which locks the SIJ in position. The near leg is then slid of the table and an extension force is applied while a flexion force is applied simultaneously through the opposite leg resulting in a torsional stress on the SIJs.


Last revised: June 29, 2018br> by Chai Rasavong, MPT, COMT, CMTPT, MBA

 

REFERENCES

1. LeClair, L., Frank, C (November 10, 2016). The Symptomatic SI Joint: Clinical Examination, Diagnosis and Treatment. SI-BONE - Integrated Spine Care, Milwaukee, WI.
2. Laslett M. Evidence Based Diagnosis and treatement of the painful Sacroiliac Joint. J. Manip THer. 2008;16(3):142-52.
3. Robinson HS, et al. The reliability of slected motion and pain provocation tests for the sacroiliac joint, Man Ther. 2007;12:72-9.
4. Devin CJ, et al. Hip-Spine Syndrome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012;20:434-42
5. Vanelderen P, et al. Sacroiliac Joint Pain. Pain Pract. 2010 Sept-Oct; 10(5):470-8.



Terms & Conditions

Please review our terms and conditions carefully before utilization of the Site. The information on this Site is for informational purposes only and should in no way replace a conventional visit to an actual live physical therapist or other healthcare professional. It is recommended that you seek professional and medical advise from your physical therapist or physician prior to any form of self treatment.



 
 
      
Advertisement
.